Business Taxation: SMEs and Family Businesses | Key insights

0688NAT_Tax_Summit-Project_Reform_Blog-Headers_1024x512 (2)-png

The Tax Summit: Project Reform is underway! Last week, our speakers, John Ioannou, CTA, Deloitte Private, Mark Molesworth, CTA, BDO and Andrew Noolan, CTA, Brown Wright Stein Lawyers joined Robyn Jacobson, CTA, Senior Advocate at The Tax Institute who facilitated a discussion on the taxation of SMEs and family businesses.

During the session, our speakers and Robyn looked at the taxation of business income and entity structuring issues relevant to SMEs, with a particular focus on complexities within our current tax system, and possible reform pathways for these issues. Topics covered in this wide-ranging and informative discussion included:

  • What the optimal taxation system for SMEs might look like and the potential to elect for a “flow-through” option
  • Corporate tax rate and franking changes and the complexity surrounding base rate entities
  • The benefits of having a single tax rate for all companies and aligning the top marginal tax rate with the corporate rate
  • The ins-and-outs of optimal imputation systems and the value of refundable taxing credits for superannuation funds
  • The complexity of the various imputation integrity measures and potential pathways for simplifying the system
  • The taxation of trusts – how can this be simplified? What role should reforming section 99A of the ITAA 1936 play, if any?
  • The purpose, intent, and actual effect of the rules in Division 7A, including the loan terms, the proposed self-correction mechanism, the proposed 14-year amendment period, much needed transitional rules and the treatment of unpaid present entitlements.


We’re sharing a selection of the highlights from the session here. To watch the full webinar and engage with the reform ideas John, Mark, Andrew and Robyn put forward, register for a Full Access Virtual Pass to The Tax Summit: Project Reform. Your pass includes access to all future sessions and the recordings of past sessions.



Aligning corporate and individual tax rates

Over the past three decades, the corporate tax rate has continued to be lowered from its peak of 49% in the mid-1980s – but have we landed at the correct level? Is the corporate tax rate still too high? Our speakers were broadly in agreement that an alignment between corporate and individual tax rates would simplify the system – but getting there is not so simple.

“This disparity really drives a lot of the ugly bits of the tax law that we don’t like dealing with. And so, if it were possible to bring these closer together at least the income tax law would be simpler,” Mark said.

“You then have the question of, well where does the Government get its revenue from and does it get it from taxes on consumption so we’re essentially going back to those individuals to fill the gap in the tax take, which occurs when you drop the individual tax rates.”

A higher GST rate was one solution mentioned, but there is more discussion to be had on this topic.

John was of the opinion that aligning the tax rates between corporates, trusts and individuals would have the biggest impact in terms of reforming our tax system.

“That in itself would force a re-think of so many other things,” he said.



Simplifying trusts

In a discussion around how the taxation of trusts could be simplified and made more efficient, the experts considered the interaction between section 99A and Division 7A. When Robyn posed the big picture question of whether we would have any corporate beneficiaries if not for the high rate in section 99A, John’s answer was clear: No.

“[Section] 99A was introduced at a time when companies couldn’t accumulate efficiently, and people started to use trusts to accumulate. [Section] 99A was designed explicitly as a clear disincentive to avoid accumulation,” he said.

“But again, we have a provision that was introduced to target specific issue and behaviour. The law relating to companies has since changed and [section] 99A is a relic, which absolutely needs to change.”

Ultimately, Andrew pinpointed simplifying the taxation of trusts as the reform measure packing the biggest punch.

“Simplifying the taxation of trusts: just distribute the money on the tax return and deal with it. It would save a lot of small enterprises, their accountants, their lawyers, a lot of time,” he said.

Taxing type of income or type of entity?

One thread that carried through a number of the topics was the idea of applying a tax rate based on the type of income, rather than looking at the type of entity deriving the income, whether company, trust or individual.

“If we’re talking about an income tax and we’re talking about using tax rates to incentivise certain types of behaviour, you’ve got to look at the type of income being derived and then equalising the tax rates on that type of income across the system, irrespective of entity type,” Mark said.

“From my point of view, taxing the type of income, not the type of entity would be the biggest game changer.”

This was just a snapshot of some of the ideas discussed in the session. To listen to all the insights raised, register for a Full Access Virtual Ticket to The Tax Summit: Project Reform, for access to all sessions, past and present.

Community Forum - The Tax Institute

Have your say.

Head to our member forum, Community, to continue the discussion around our speakers' insights and SME and Family Business taxation.


John Ioannou

John Ioannou, CTA, Deloitte Private
Mark Molesworth Mark Molesworth, CTA, BDO
Andrew Noolan Andrew Noolan, CTA, Brown Wright Stein Lawyers


See all

Follow Us